Area integrals
In the previous section we defined line integrals over a curve, . Here, we consider an integral of a function, over a region in the -plane:
Area integrals are computed by converting them into repeated integrals. To do this, we need the region to be enclosed from below and above by curves and , respectively, as follows:
When carrying out the inner integral (i.e. with respect to ), the variable is treated as a constant. What we are really doing here, is dividing up the region into small rectangles using a closely spaced mesh of vertical and horizontal lines and then taking the sum over all rectangles in the subdivision of .
The order in which the terms are added (i.e. adding up rectangles in the vertical lines first and adding up the rectangles in the horizontal lines second or vice-versa) does not really matter provided that the function is continuous in the region of interest (see Fubini's theorem). So, in Eq. (2.75), we integrate with respect to first from a lower bounding curve to an upper bounding curve and then integrate over from to . Similarly, we can have the region be bounded by curves and on the left and right, respectively and then integrating with respect to from to . This is given by:
Fubini's theorem
If is continuous on the region given by the rectangle then,
We note the following properties: (a) ;
(b) , where is a constant;
(c) If the region is complicated, the integral can usually be carried out by splitting the region into into two (or more) subregions and , then:
Example 2.10 Evaluate the following integral:
where is the shaded region given in Fig. 2.74,
Solution Figure 2.74 shows a semicircle of radius 2 (recall the equation of a circle of radius 2 is given in implicit form by ) and the shaded region, is defined by:
These inequalities may be substituted in Eq. (2.105) to give the following double integral:
We first evaluate the inner integral treating as a constant:
Next, we evaluate the outer integral which gives the result of the double integral:
Figure 2.6: Integration over part of a semicircle (see Example 2.10).
Higher order integrals
Triple integrals can be calculated by the same limiting process by subdividing the volume into a mesh of small boxes using planes parallel to the coordinate planes. Similarly to Eq. (2.75) [or Eq. (2.76)], we have:
Quadruple and higher integrals can be evaluated by similar repetitive techniques.
Change of variables
In single-variable calculus, sometimes we find that it is convenient to express an integral through a change of variable. For example, let us say we want to integrate and we find that it is more convenient to do so by changing the 's into a different variable, say , through . Then, by the substitution rule, we find that we can express the integral as:
note of course, that in going from 's to 's, we also need to change the limits of integration. In Eq. (2.81), we find and through and , respectively. We want to do something similar in the case of double integrals (and higher order integrals). Usually, the reason for changing variables is so that we can obtain an integral that we can carry out with the new variables. Another reason that is related to the area and surface integrals we looked at in the previous sections, is to convert the given region into a nicer region that we can work with. For example, if the given region is an ellipse, we might want to use a change of variable to transform the region into a disk (which is much nicer to deal with) or, if we have a scalene or an obtuse triangle, we might want to transform it into a right-angle triangle. Before we move on, let us do an example in which we use a transformation to change a region given in -coordinates to -coordinates.
Example 2.13 Apply the transformation and on the ellipse to obtain a new region in -coordinates.
Solution All we need to do here is plug the transformation into the equation for the ellipse:
The new region is given by a disk of radius 2 .
In order to change variables in a double integral we need the Jacobian of the transformation. We use transformations and to go from the -coordinate space to -coordinate space. Let us relate back to Eq. (2.81); in using the substitution rule to change from - to -variable space in the single-variable case through the transformation , we made use of the change of with using . In the case of two variables we need to compute the following quantity:
Note that Eq. (2.82) is the Jacobian determinant of the transformation and . Definition 2.7 Suppose we want to integrate over the region . Under the transformation, and , the region becomes and the integral becomes:
where is the Jacobian determinant given by Eq. (2.82). Note that denotes the absolute value of . Example 2.14 Evaluate the following integral
where is the trapezoidal region with vertices and , using the transformation and .
Solution Figure 2.7 shows the region . Each one of the equations of the lines (the lines corresponding to different equations are shown in different colours) was found using 2 points connected by the line. Now let us use the transformation on each line. For , we have:
For , we have:
For , we have:
For , we have:
The new region, is given by a rectangle whose sides are given by the four equations and . It follows that and are defined within:
We will be using Eq. (2.83) to carry out the double integral so the next step is to compute the Jacobian of the transformation:
Finally, the integral is given by:
Figure 2.7: The trapezoidal region in Example 2.14.
Consider now a situation in which instead of having a transformation involving and , we have
In this case, we define , in an analogous manner to Eq. (2.82):
Then, the transformation from to becomes
and the transformation from back is given by
hence,
Thus, we can now write down something analogous to Definition 2.7, expressed by Eq. (2.83) above:
As an example, consider the integral
If and , then is given by
Thus, from which it follows that
The integral can then be expressed as follows
where is a region in space.
We can generalise these ideas to changing variables in higher integrals. For example, the Jacobian determinant of the transformation , and is given by:
By making use of Eq. (2.95), the variables in the triple integral are changed as follows:
where is the volume in the -space corresponding to the volume in -space.