Integration techniques
Certain classes of functions can be integrated easily, like for instance, integrating powers of involves adding one to the exponent and dividing by the new exponent. Generally, however, integration can be tricky even for very simple functions. Moreover, there is no guarantee that an anti-derivative can be expressed in closed form, i.e. in terms of elementary functions. The integral of is an example of this. In what follows, we look at several techniques that can be used to simplify the integrals.
1. Inspection
Sometimes it is clear enough to see that the integrand is the derivative of a simple function. In such a case, no elaborate technique is necessary.
For example, consider
We know that the integral must be proportional to so it is easy to guess a function whose derivative is the integrand . By the chain rule, we have
and so
Note that this can be solved by substitution which we look at next in this section. Further, consider a function which can be expressed as a logarithmic derivative,
Then, the indefinite integral is given by
For example,
since
with . The factor compensates for the 2 in the numerator.
2. Substitution
This is an application of the chain rule to integration problems. In computing
it is possible to expedite the calculation by writing as a function of a new variable and then integrating wrt . Writing , where is a differentiable function,
where . To see this, we use and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. We start from the derivative of the composite function given by,
Then, using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus we have,
We also have again from the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
Since the RHS of two of these eqns are equal, then their LHS are equal which proves the step when we expedited the calculation by writing as a function of a new variable and then integrating wrt .
If is a 1 - 1 function then, . Let and ; then and . Accordingly, the substitution eqn becomes
Note that for an indefinite integral we have the result
where . Informally, to compute , we write as and as to arrive at
which gives a function of . Finally, rewrite as a function of (this step often involves taking inverses). Note that there is no general way to identify the correct substitution as this typically depends on the particular form of the integral.
Substitution Example
If we wanted to Evaluate the following integral:
We use the substitution as this allows us to simplify the denominator by application of the identity . So, with and the Eqn becomes
Next,
and so substituting in this eqn from before:
We have:
This simplifies to
where is a constant. Finally, going back to the original variable, we have
since .
If is a rational function of and/or , consider the substitution which gives
For example,
3. Integration by parts
Recall the integral:
this was easy to compute simply by inspecting that the integrand is the derivative of a simple function. Alternatively, we can use the substitution rule with .
Now, consider instead the integral
in this case we cannot find a substitution that we can use to evaluate the integral. To proceed, we use the integration by parts formula. Starting from the product rule formula,
and integrating both sides, i.e.
or
where we split up the integral on the RHS by Property II in descibed here. Note that the constant of integration is omitted here since it can be absorbed in the constants resulting from the other two integrals. Rearranging gives the integration by parts formula as,
The integration by parts formula is typically remembered as follows,
To use this formula, we will need to identify and and then compute and . This method of integrating by parts is useful if the integral on the RHS is 'easier' than the integral on the LHS. Let us look at an example:
Solution We can use integration by parts by choosing and . These make up the LHS of The integration by parts formula. For the RHS, we need and . Differentiating wrt gives and integrating wrt gives (again, the constant of integration can be absorbed to the constant obtained when we perform the integral in the next step). Now, with , and known, plugging in The integration by parts formula, yields
Some integrals can be computed by repeated integration by parts like
Here we choose and ; then and .
by integrating by parts again (on the coloured term),
Finally, substituting back in
Similarly, to compute , we need to integrate by parts times. To compute , integrate by parts times or, alternatively, define and use integration by parts to find a relation between and .
4. Partial fractions
We revisit the function which can be expressed as a logarithmic derivative:
is given by a quotient where the numerator is given as the derivative of the denominator or up to a constant multiple. Then, evaluating is quite simple. In situations where the numerator is not the derivative of the denominator however, integrating can be tricky. Suppose now that is a rational function. That is
where is a polynomial of degree and is a polynomial of degree . To integrate , we can perform partial fraction decomposition.
Next, we outline some general rules for partial fraction decomposition assuming that the degree of is less than the degree of , i.e.
Examples of partial fraction decomposition:
Rational form | Partial fraction form | |
---|---|---|
1. | ||
2. | ||
3. | ||
4. | ||
5. |
Note that in cases 2 and 4 above, the factor can be a repeating factor of any order, not necessarily 2 . For a -repeating factor therefore, the partial fraction decomposition is made up of repeating factors with exponents . Moreover, in case 5, it is assumed that the quadratic factor cannot be factorised further. In the table above, , and are real numbers to be determined. The cover-up rule is often used to determine the constants.
For example, if we wanted to evaluate the integral:
The integrand is given by
with and . We use the second case from the table to carry out the partial fraction decomposition as
where and are constants to be determined. Using algebra, we have , . Using the decomposition, the integral is
5. Complex numbers
Some integrals can be computed using complex numbers to simplify many of the integration formulae. Suppose we want to evaluate
We have seen that the integration by parts technique can be used to solve such integrals. A much simpler approach is to use the exponential function and Euler's formula. The integrand is given by the real part of , denoted by
and so we have
To simplify, we multiply by ,
which, upon further simplification evaluates the integral as